Sat Aft 49er Pairs Only Session June 29, 2013
Scores after  8 rounds  Average:   84.0      Section  R  North-South
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      Overall Rank      MPs
                         G     H     I     G     H     I
  6   57.14   96.00  I   1     1     1     3     2     1    0.92(OH) Ellen Miller - Sharon Haynes
  5   56.25   94.50  I   2     2     2     4     3     2    0.69(OH) Aaron Jones - Chuck Jones
  4   54.17   91.00  H   3     3                 5          0.39(OH) Joanne Lewin - Deborah Drysdale
  1   51.19   86.00  H                                               Cathy Priest - Maryann Hinden
  2   48.81   82.00  H                                               Janice Flowers-Sonne - Wray Brett
  3   46.13   77.50  H                                               Michael Harris - Patricia Larson
  7   43.45   73.00  I                                               Gloria Reiss - Linda Yazell
  8   42.86   72.00  I                                               Alexandra Narasin - Cynthia Yock

Sat Aft 49er Pairs Only Session June 29, 2013
Scores after  8 rounds  Average:   84.0      Section  R  East-West
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      Overall Rank      MPs
                         G     H     I     G     H     I
  3   61.31  103.00  H   1     1           1     1          1.35(OG) Ken Pelowski - Lori Mirek
  8   58.33   98.00  G   2                 2                1.01(OG) Christine Furnas - Helen Johnson
  5   54.46   91.50  I   3     2     1     5     4     3    0.51(OH) Charlene Reimnitz - Joel Reimnitz
  6   50.89   85.50  I                                               George Roupe - Barbara Roupe
  4   47.92   80.50  G                                               Joan Sullivan - Ann Blach
  2   46.43   78.00  H                                               Hide Tanigami - Judy Tanigami
  7   41.67   70.00  I                                               Judy Font - Elizabeth Burke
  1   38.99   65.50  H                                               Isabel Shaw - Sheila Hochman



Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
K
K Q 9 6
8 2
Q 10 8 7 6 4
A 7 5 3
8 2
K 10 9 6 3
A K
N
WE
S
J 10 2
J 7 5 4 3
5
J 9 5 3
Q 9 8 6 4
A 10
A Q J 7 4
2

S 2N; S 2♠; S 2; S 3; N 1N; N 2; S 2; N 1♠; N 1; N 1; Par +120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NTS21207.000.005-Jones-Jones vs 8-Furnas-Johnson
2 ♠S21106.001.008-Narasin-Yock vs 7-Font-Burke
2 W−21005.002.002-Flowers-Sonne-Brett vs 2-Tanigami-Tanigami
2 S2904.003.004-Lewin-Drysdale vs 6-Roupe-Roupe
2 ♠S−1502.504.501-Priest-Hinden vs 1-Shaw-Hochman
3 NTS−1502.504.503-Harris-Larson vs 4-Sullivan-Blach
3 NTS−31500.506.506-Miller-Haynes vs 3-Pelowski-Mirek
3 NTS−31500.506.507-Reiss-Yazell vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
4
J 9 8 4
8 2
K 9 8 7 3 2
A Q 10
K 10 5
10 5 4 3
J 10 6
N
WE
S
K 9 5 2
Q 7 3 2
A
A Q 5 4
J 8 7 6 3
A 6
K Q J 9 7 6

EW 3; EW 2N; EW 2♠; EW 3; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 S−11007.000.007-Reiss-Yazell vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
3 E31106.001.004-Lewin-Drysdale vs 6-Roupe-Roupe
1 NTW21205.002.006-Miller-Haynes vs 3-Pelowski-Mirek
2 E31404.003.003-Harris-Larson vs 4-Sullivan-Blach
2 NTE41803.004.002-Flowers-Sonne-Brett vs 2-Tanigami-Tanigami
3 S−22002.005.001-Priest-Hinden vs 1-Shaw-Hochman
3 NTE34001.006.008-Narasin-Yock vs 7-Font-Burke
3 NTW44300.007.005-Jones-Jones vs 8-Furnas-Johnson

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
J 7 6 4 3
Q 9 7 4 2
A 10 9
A 2
10 5 3
Q 4
A K 8 7 4 3
N
WE
S
9 5
K 8
J 8 7 3
Q 10 9 5 2
K Q 10 8
A J 6
K 6 5 2
J 6

NS 6♠; NS 5; NS 4; EW 2; Par +980

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠N54506.500.501-Priest-Hinden vs 1-Shaw-Hochman
4 ♠N54506.500.506-Miller-Haynes vs 3-Pelowski-Mirek
4 ♠S44204.502.507-Reiss-Yazell vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
4 ♠S44204.502.508-Narasin-Yock vs 7-Font-Burke
2 N41702.504.504-Lewin-Drysdale vs 6-Roupe-Roupe
3 ♠N41702.504.505-Jones-Jones vs 8-Furnas-Johnson
2 W31101.006.003-Harris-Larson vs 4-Sullivan-Blach
4 W41300.007.002-Flowers-Sonne-Brett vs 2-Tanigami-Tanigami

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
A 8 7 3
K J 10 4
A K J
10 9
Q J 10 6 5 2
A Q
10 8
7 6 5
N
WE
S
9
9 7 5
9 5 4 2
K J 8 3 2
K 4
8 6 3 2
Q 7 6 3
A Q 4

NS 5N; NS 5; NS 5; NS 2♠; NS 3; Par +660

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N66807.000.006-Miller-Haynes vs 2-Tanigami-Tanigami
3 NTN56606.001.005-Jones-Jones vs 7-Font-Burke
4 S46205.002.002-Flowers-Sonne-Brett vs 1-Shaw-Hochman
3 NTN36003.004.004-Lewin-Drysdale vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
3 NTN36003.004.007-Reiss-Yazell vs 4-Sullivan-Blach
3 NTN36003.004.008-Narasin-Yock vs 6-Roupe-Roupe
3 S52001.006.001-Priest-Hinden vs 8-Furnas-Johnson
3 N41700.007.003-Harris-Larson vs 3-Pelowski-Mirek

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
J 2
Q 7 5
A J 9 5
A J 3 2
A 10 9 6 5
A K 9 8
K 3
Q 8
N
WE
S
Q
10 6 4 2
10 8 6 4 2
10 7 5
K 8 7 4 3
J 3
Q 7
K 9 6 4

NS 2N; NS 3; NS 1♠; EW 1; NS 1; Par +120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTN31507.000.004-Lewin-Drysdale vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
1 NTN21206.001.003-Harris-Larson vs 3-Pelowski-Mirek
3 N31105.002.006-Miller-Haynes vs 2-Tanigami-Tanigami
2 ♠W−21004.003.002-Flowers-Sonne-Brett vs 1-Shaw-Hochman
2 W−1503.004.008-Narasin-Yock vs 6-Roupe-Roupe
2 NTN−11002.005.005-Jones-Jones vs 7-Font-Burke
2 W41701.006.007-Reiss-Yazell vs 4-Sullivan-Blach
2 ♠S−33000.007.001-Priest-Hinden vs 8-Furnas-Johnson

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
Q 9 8 3
A 10 9 2
8
K J 5 3
K 2
K J 8 7 6
J 10 6
10 9 4
N
WE
S
J 10 7 6 5
Q 4 3
A Q 3
6 2
A 4
5
K 9 7 5 4 2
A Q 8 7

NS 5; NS 4; NS 2N; NS 1♠; NS 1; Par +400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTS44306.500.505-Jones-Jones vs 7-Font-Burke
3 NTN44306.500.506-Miller-Haynes vs 2-Tanigami-Tanigami
3 NTS34005.002.001-Priest-Hinden vs 8-Furnas-Johnson
2 NTN21203.503.503-Harris-Larson vs 3-Pelowski-Mirek
2 NTN21203.503.507-Reiss-Yazell vs 4-Sullivan-Blach
2 S2902.005.008-Narasin-Yock vs 6-Roupe-Roupe
3 NTN−1500.506.502-Flowers-Sonne-Brett vs 1-Shaw-Hochman
2 S−1500.506.504-Lewin-Drysdale vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
Q 9
9 3
A K J 8 5
5 4 3 2
A 8 5
Q 5
10 7 4
A K Q J 7
N
WE
S
6 3
A J 8 7 2
Q 6 3 2
10 8
K J 10 7 4 2
K 10 6 4
9
9 6

NS 2♠; EW 1N; EW 2; EW 2; EW 1; Par +110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W−22006.500.501-Priest-Hinden vs 7-Font-Burke
3 W−22006.500.504-Lewin-Drysdale vs 4-Sullivan-Blach
2 W−11004.502.503-Harris-Larson vs 2-Tanigami-Tanigami
3 W−11004.502.505-Jones-Jones vs 6-Roupe-Roupe
3 W31103.004.008-Narasin-Yock vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
4 ♠S−22002.005.006-Miller-Haynes vs 1-Shaw-Hochman
4 ♠S−44001.006.002-Flowers-Sonne-Brett vs 8-Furnas-Johnson
3 NTW36000.007.007-Reiss-Yazell vs 3-Pelowski-Mirek

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
9 6 2
10 6 5 2
J 5 4
A 3 2
K 7
J 7 4
K 10 9 3
K Q 10 4
N
WE
S
A Q 5 3
Q 9 8 3
A Q 8
9 8
J 10 8 4
A K
7 6 2
J 7 6 5

EW 4N; EW 4; EW 3♠; EW 3; EW 3; Par −430

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW−1507.000.006-Miller-Haynes vs 1-Shaw-Hochman
1 ♠E31406.001.001-Priest-Hinden vs 7-Font-Burke
3 NTW34004.502.504-Lewin-Drysdale vs 4-Sullivan-Blach
3 NTE34004.502.505-Jones-Jones vs 6-Roupe-Roupe
3 NTW44301.505.502-Flowers-Sonne-Brett vs 8-Furnas-Johnson
3 NTW44301.505.503-Harris-Larson vs 2-Tanigami-Tanigami
3 NTW44301.505.507-Reiss-Yazell vs 3-Pelowski-Mirek
3 NTE44301.505.508-Narasin-Yock vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
Q J 8 3 2
Q 7
Q 8 5 3 2
8
10 7 5 4
2
J 4
A 10 9 6 4 3
N
WE
S
9
A K 8 4
10 9 7 6
Q 7 5 2
A K 6
J 10 9 6 5 3
A K
K J

NS 4♠; NS 3N; NS 3; EW 3; NS 2; Par +420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S54507.000.005-Jones-Jones vs 6-Roupe-Roupe
4 ♠N44206.001.001-Priest-Hinden vs 7-Font-Burke
2 S41705.002.006-Miller-Haynes vs 1-Shaw-Hochman
2 ♠S31403.503.502-Flowers-Sonne-Brett vs 8-Furnas-Johnson
3 S31403.503.504-Lewin-Drysdale vs 4-Sullivan-Blach
4 ♠N−21001.505.503-Harris-Larson vs 2-Tanigami-Tanigami
4 S−21001.505.507-Reiss-Yazell vs 3-Pelowski-Mirek
4 N−31500.007.008-Narasin-Yock vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
10 6 3
Q 9 6
6 4
A 9 7 6 5
A 8 4 2
K 4 3
K Q 8 5
3 2
N
WE
S
K J 9 7
J
J 10 9 3
K J 8 4
Q 5
A 10 8 7 5 2
A 7 2
Q 10

EW 4♠; EW 4; NS 1; EW 1; Par −620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 S31406.500.503-Harris-Larson vs 1-Shaw-Hochman
2 S31406.500.504-Lewin-Drysdale vs 3-Pelowski-Mirek
2 S−11005.002.007-Reiss-Yazell vs 2-Tanigami-Tanigami
3 ♠E31404.003.008-Narasin-Yock vs 4-Sullivan-Blach
3 ♠W41703.004.001-Priest-Hinden vs 6-Roupe-Roupe
4 S−22001.006.002-Flowers-Sonne-Brett vs 7-Font-Burke
4 S−22001.006.005-Jones-Jones vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
3 S−22001.006.006-Miller-Haynes vs 8-Furnas-Johnson

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
Q 4
A K 9 5 4 3
A 8 7 6 2
10 9 7 5 2
A 10 9 8 5
J 10
5
N
WE
S
A J 8 3
K J 6
8 6
J 10 9 3
K Q 6 4
7 3 2
Q 7 2
K Q 4

NS 5; NS 4; EW 2♠; NS 1N; EW 1; Par +400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN34007.000.003-Harris-Larson vs 1-Shaw-Hochman
4 N71906.001.008-Narasin-Yock vs 4-Sullivan-Blach
4 N61705.002.002-Flowers-Sonne-Brett vs 7-Font-Burke
2 S41304.003.006-Miller-Haynes vs 8-Furnas-Johnson
3 ♠W−1503.004.001-Priest-Hinden vs 6-Roupe-Roupe
5 N−1501.505.505-Jones-Jones vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
3 N−1501.505.507-Reiss-Yazell vs 2-Tanigami-Tanigami
5 N−21000.007.004-Lewin-Drysdale vs 3-Pelowski-Mirek

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
K Q J 7
5 4
Q 8 6 2
10 7 5
A 8 6 3
J 9
A K 9 3
Q J 9
N
WE
S
9 5
7 3 2
J 7 4
A 8 4 3 2
10 4 2
A K Q 10 8 6
10 5
K 6

NS 3; NS 2♠; NS 1N; EW 2; EW 1; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NTW−42007.000.005-Jones-Jones vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
3 S41706.001.001-Priest-Hinden vs 6-Roupe-Roupe
1 NTW−31505.002.007-Reiss-Yazell vs 2-Tanigami-Tanigami
3 S31404.003.008-Narasin-Yock vs 4-Sullivan-Blach
1 NTW−21002.504.502-Flowers-Sonne-Brett vs 7-Font-Burke
3 W−21002.504.506-Miller-Haynes vs 8-Furnas-Johnson
1 NTW−1501.006.004-Lewin-Drysdale vs 3-Pelowski-Mirek
3 S−22000.007.003-Harris-Larson vs 1-Shaw-Hochman

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
10 7 6 2
8 4
A Q 3 2
A J 8
K Q 9 5
Q J 6
J 6
K Q 4 2
N
WE
S
A J 8 4 3
9 7 5 2
10 8
6 3
A K 10 3
K 9 7 5 4
10 9 7 5

NS 6; NS 4; NS 2N; EW 1♠; NS 1; Par +1370

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 ♠W−22007.000.006-Miller-Haynes vs 7-Font-Burke
3 S51505.002.001-Priest-Hinden vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
3 S51505.002.004-Lewin-Drysdale vs 2-Tanigami-Tanigami
3 S51505.002.007-Reiss-Yazell vs 1-Shaw-Hochman
2 ♠E−11002.005.003-Harris-Larson vs 8-Furnas-Johnson
3 ♠E−11002.005.005-Jones-Jones vs 4-Sullivan-Blach
2 ♠E−11002.005.008-Narasin-Yock vs 3-Pelowski-Mirek
1 ♠W1800.007.002-Flowers-Sonne-Brett vs 6-Roupe-Roupe

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
A K Q 7
A 10 9
4 3 2
J 6 2
J 8 2
5 3
A Q 8 6
K Q 7 4
N
WE
S
4
8 7 6
K J 10 9 7 5
A 5 3
10 9 6 5 3
K Q J 4 2
10 9 8

NS 4♠; NS 4; EW 4; EW 1; Par +100: EW 5×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S44206.500.502-Flowers-Sonne-Brett vs 6-Roupe-Roupe
4 ♠N44206.500.507-Reiss-Yazell vs 1-Shaw-Hochman
5 ×E−11005.002.006-Miller-Haynes vs 7-Font-Burke
4 W41302.005.001-Priest-Hinden vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
2 E41302.005.003-Harris-Larson vs 8-Furnas-Johnson
3 E41302.005.004-Lewin-Drysdale vs 2-Tanigami-Tanigami
3 E41302.005.005-Jones-Jones vs 4-Sullivan-Blach
3 E41302.005.008-Narasin-Yock vs 3-Pelowski-Mirek

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
A 8 3 2
J 10
7 5
A K 6 4 2
J 4
K 7 5 4 3
A K Q J 4
J
N
WE
S
Q 9 6 5
A Q 2
10 8 2
Q 8 5
K 10 7
9 8 6
9 6 3
10 9 7 3

EW 4; EW 3N; EW 4; EW 1♠; NS 1; Par −420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 W−1507.000.006-Miller-Haynes vs 7-Font-Burke
4 W44204.502.502-Flowers-Sonne-Brett vs 6-Roupe-Roupe
4 W44204.502.503-Harris-Larson vs 8-Furnas-Johnson
4 W44204.502.504-Lewin-Drysdale vs 2-Tanigami-Tanigami
4 W44204.502.507-Reiss-Yazell vs 1-Shaw-Hochman
4 W54501.006.001-Priest-Hinden vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
4 W54501.006.005-Jones-Jones vs 4-Sullivan-Blach
4 W54501.006.008-Narasin-Yock vs 3-Pelowski-Mirek

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
8 2
Q J 10
K Q 10 4 3
K 7 2
A 7 6
9 8 7 4 2
6
A Q 5 3
N
WE
S
K 4 3
A K 3
5 2
J 9 8 6 4
Q J 10 9 5
6 5
A J 9 8 7
10

EW 4; EW 4; EW 1N; NS 2; NS 1♠; Par −500: NS 4♠×−3; NS 5×−3

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 N2907.000.002-Flowers-Sonne-Brett vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
PassPass6.001.008-Narasin-Yock vs 2-Tanigami-Tanigami
3 N−1505.002.004-Lewin-Drysdale vs 1-Shaw-Hochman
2 W21104.003.003-Harris-Larson vs 7-Font-Burke
4 E41302.504.505-Jones-Jones vs 3-Pelowski-Mirek
3 E41302.504.506-Miller-Haynes vs 6-Roupe-Roupe
2 W41701.006.007-Reiss-Yazell vs 8-Furnas-Johnson
4 W46200.007.001-Priest-Hinden vs 4-Sullivan-Blach

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
K Q J 10
Q 10 9
8 7 5
Q 10 9
A 9 7
8 7 6 4
K Q 6 3
4 2
N
WE
S
5 4 3 2
A J 2
A 4 2
J 8 7
8 6
K 5 3
J 10 9
A K 6 5 3

NS 1N; NS 2; NS 1♠; EW 1; Par +90

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTS21207.000.001-Priest-Hinden vs 4-Sullivan-Blach
1 W−1505.501.503-Harris-Larson vs 7-Font-Burke
2 W−1505.501.504-Lewin-Drysdale vs 1-Shaw-Hochman
PassPass3.503.502-Flowers-Sonne-Brett vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
PassPass3.503.507-Reiss-Yazell vs 8-Furnas-Johnson
3 S−1501.505.505-Jones-Jones vs 3-Pelowski-Mirek
2 NTS−1501.505.508-Narasin-Yock vs 2-Tanigami-Tanigami
3 S−21000.007.006-Miller-Haynes vs 6-Roupe-Roupe

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
A Q 8 7 5
Q 9 4
5 3
K J 2
J 4 2
A J 5 2
A K J 2
Q 9
N
WE
S
6 3
K 7 3
7 4
10 8 7 6 4 3
K 10 9
10 8 6
Q 10 9 8 6
A 5

NS 3♠; NS 2N; NS 2; EW 2; EW 1; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW−52507.000.005-Jones-Jones vs 3-Pelowski-Mirek
5 E−31506.001.001-Priest-Hinden vs 4-Sullivan-Blach
2 ♠N31404.502.502-Flowers-Sonne-Brett vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
2 ♠N31404.502.507-Reiss-Yazell vs 8-Furnas-Johnson
2 ♠N21103.004.004-Lewin-Drysdale vs 1-Shaw-Hochman
3 ♠N−11001.505.503-Harris-Larson vs 7-Font-Burke
3 ♠N−11001.505.508-Narasin-Yock vs 2-Tanigami-Tanigami
3 W31100.007.006-Miller-Haynes vs 6-Roupe-Roupe

Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
K 8
10 2
J 9 5 4 2
A 5 3 2
10 5 4
K 9 5 3
K 10 7
J 9 7
N
WE
S
Q J 6 3 2
A Q 8 6 4
Q 6
4
A 9 7
J 7
A 8 3
K Q 10 8 6

NS 2N; EW 2♠; EW 2; NS 3; NS 3; Par +120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠E−33007.000.005-Jones-Jones vs 2-Tanigami-Tanigami
3 S41305.501.502-Flowers-Sonne-Brett vs 4-Sullivan-Blach
3 S41305.501.506-Miller-Haynes vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
1 NTS21204.003.004-Lewin-Drysdale vs 8-Furnas-Johnson
3 E−11003.004.008-Narasin-Yock vs 1-Shaw-Hochman
5 N−31502.005.003-Harris-Larson vs 6-Roupe-Roupe
3 W41701.006.001-Priest-Hinden vs 3-Pelowski-Mirek
4 E46200.007.007-Reiss-Yazell vs 7-Font-Burke

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
10 9 5 4
A K 7 3
Q 10 5 2
10
K J 8 7 2
J
4 3
A K 9 8 4
N
WE
S
Q 6
Q 10 9 8 6 4
A J 8 6
6
A 3
5 2
K 9 7
Q J 7 5 3 2

E 2♠; EW 2; NS 1N; W 1♠; E 1; NS 1; Par −110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 E−22005.501.501-Priest-Hinden vs 3-Pelowski-Mirek
4 ♠W−22005.501.503-Harris-Larson vs 6-Roupe-Roupe
3 NTW−22005.501.504-Lewin-Drysdale vs 8-Furnas-Johnson
3 E−22005.501.507-Reiss-Yazell vs 7-Font-Burke
3 NTE−11002.504.502-Flowers-Sonne-Brett vs 4-Sullivan-Blach
3 E−11002.504.506-Miller-Haynes vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
3 NTE36000.506.505-Jones-Jones vs 2-Tanigami-Tanigami
3 NTE36000.506.508-Narasin-Yock vs 1-Shaw-Hochman

Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul
K Q 8 7
J 9 7 5 3
Q J
A 3
A 10 3
K 8 6
A 5 4
Q J 4 2
N
WE
S
6 4
A 10 4
10 9 6 3
9 7 6 5
J 9 5 2
Q 2
K 8 7 2
K 10 8

NS 3♠; NS 2; NS 1N; NS 1; EW 1; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 ♠S31405.501.502-Flowers-Sonne-Brett vs 4-Sullivan-Blach
2 ♠N31405.501.503-Harris-Larson vs 6-Roupe-Roupe
2 ♠S31405.501.505-Jones-Jones vs 2-Tanigami-Tanigami
2 S31405.501.508-Narasin-Yock vs 1-Shaw-Hochman
1 NTS21203.004.004-Lewin-Drysdale vs 8-Furnas-Johnson
1 NTS1902.005.006-Miller-Haynes vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
2 NTS−11001.006.007-Reiss-Yazell vs 7-Font-Burke
4 ♠S−22000.007.001-Priest-Hinden vs 3-Pelowski-Mirek

Board 22
East Deals
E-W Vul
K Q 6
7
A K 7 4 2
A 10 5 4
J 2
6 4 3
J 10 8 6 5 3
8 3
N
WE
S
A 10 5
A K J 10 9 8
Q 9
J 2
9 8 7 4 3
Q 5 2
K Q 9 7 6

NS 4♠; NS 4; NS 2N; EW 1; Par +420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠N44206.500.501-Priest-Hinden vs 2-Tanigami-Tanigami
4 ♠N44206.500.507-Reiss-Yazell vs 6-Roupe-Roupe
3 ♠N41705.002.006-Miller-Haynes vs 4-Sullivan-Blach
2 E−11003.004.002-Flowers-Sonne-Brett vs 3-Pelowski-Mirek
2 E−11003.004.004-Lewin-Drysdale vs 7-Font-Burke
2 E−11003.004.005-Jones-Jones vs 1-Shaw-Hochman
2 NTS−1501.006.003-Harris-Larson vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
3 ×N−35000.007.008-Narasin-Yock vs 8-Furnas-Johnson

Board 23
South Deals
Both Vul
Q 9
7 6 4 2
Q J 5 2
8 7 5
A K 7 2
10 8 5
K 7 3
K Q 9
N
WE
S
6 5 4 3
A K J
9 4
A J 6 2
J 10 8
Q 9 3
A 10 8 6
10 4 3

EW 5♠; EW 4N; EW 4; EW 4; EW 2; Par −650

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 ♠W−11007.000.008-Narasin-Yock vs 8-Furnas-Johnson
2 NTW31506.001.005-Jones-Jones vs 1-Shaw-Hochman
3 NTW36005.002.004-Lewin-Drysdale vs 7-Font-Burke
4 ♠W46203.503.502-Flowers-Sonne-Brett vs 3-Pelowski-Mirek
4 ♠E46203.503.506-Miller-Haynes vs 4-Sullivan-Blach
3 NTW46302.005.003-Harris-Larson vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
4 ♠E56500.506.501-Priest-Hinden vs 2-Tanigami-Tanigami
4 ♠W56500.506.507-Reiss-Yazell vs 6-Roupe-Roupe

Board 24
West Deals
None Vul
A K 10 9 7 5
A K Q 10
3
5 3
J 2
6 4 3
K Q 10 8 4 2
6 2
N
WE
S
6
8 7
A J 9 7 6 5
A K 9 8
Q 8 4 3
J 9 5 2
Q J 10 7 4

NS 5♠; NS 5; EW 4; NS 3; Par +300: EW 6×−2

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 ♠N64807.000.005-Jones-Jones vs 1-Shaw-Hochman
5 ♠N54504.003.001-Priest-Hinden vs 2-Tanigami-Tanigami
5 ♠N54504.003.002-Flowers-Sonne-Brett vs 3-Pelowski-Mirek
5 ♠N54504.003.003-Harris-Larson vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
5 ♠N54504.003.006-Miller-Haynes vs 4-Sullivan-Blach
4 ♠N54504.003.008-Narasin-Yock vs 8-Furnas-Johnson
5 ×W−11000.506.504-Lewin-Drysdale vs 7-Font-Burke
6 W−21000.506.507-Reiss-Yazell vs 6-Roupe-Roupe